Archive | political RSS feed for this section

When Women Run, Women Win

6 Apr

 

President Obama spoke today at a forum about women shortly after a released report from the White House titled “Keeping America’s Women Moving Forward”.

During his speech President Obama reminded us all that only 3% of Fortune 500 company CEOs are women and less than 20% of seats in Congress are occupied by women.

“Is it possible that Congress would get more done if there were more women in congress?  I think it’s fair to say, that is almost guaranteed,” said President Obama.

Why aren’t there more women in Congress?  Great organization’s like The White House Project and EMILY’s List work every day to help women run and get elected to public office.  While at a summer training institute during my undergraduate career, (NEW Leadership) I learned that the problem isn’t that women aren’t getting elected over men, it’s that women aren’t even running in the first place.

I sat in a room full of 30 other females ages 18-50, and we were all asked point blank, “If you were given the opportunity to run for public office, would you take it?”  There were some “yes’s”,  a lot of “ehhh mayyyybes” and a couple flat out “no ways”.  The maybe’s and the no’s were asked to explain their reasoning.  The top 3 responses:

  1. Politics is dirty.
  2. I don’t want my family or past being put through that kind of attention.

  3. I have a family.  Being in politics would take precious time away from them.
  4. He’ll beat me.  People don’t think women are as good in politics, and if I run against a man, he’ll win.

The first reason is completely understandable, and with today’s 24/7 media/blogosphere, is a major reason that both males and females often opt out from public office.

The second reason is one of the most common reasons women choose not to do a lot of things, most importantly a certain career path such as politics.

However, the third reason I think we CAN change.  WOMEN DO win (I’m not saying all the time) but women win ALOT when they run against men.  If we can work to increase women’s confidence in running for public office, and help provide them with the tools and means to do so…I think we’d see a big difference in our Congressional makeup…and maybe a big difference in how effective our government is.

 

50 Best Moments for Women in 2011

4 Jan

H/T to my friend Laura for sending HuffPo’s article about the 50 Best Moments in 2011 for Women.  It is definitely a great way to reflect on 2011 by looking at some of the positives that have happened for women throughout the year.  I thought I’d take a second to highlight some of my  personal favorites:

  1. “The release of the new documentary ‘MissRepresentation’ makes everyone who thinks they’ve heard it before refocus on how badly the media depicts women — and how we can change that.”
  2. “When the announcer called the name of the first nominee for Best Actress in a Comedy at the 2011 Emmy Awards, Amy Poehler, instead of smiling at the camera from her seat, charged onto the stage … and every other nominee did, too. Before the winner was even announced, Poehler, Melissa McCarthy (the ultimate winner), Tina Fey, Edie Falco, Laura Linney and Martha Plimpton held hands tightly in beauty pageant fashion, making even an award for best comedian into a spoof — and proving their extraordinary talent (yet again) in the process.”
  3. “After years of objections from women’s rights advocates, the FBI advisory board recommends a broader definition of rape. Currently defined by the agency as “carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will” — wording composed in 1929 — the board votes to change the terminology to “penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim,” which notably doesn’t include the word “forcible.” It’s now up to FBI Director Robert Mueller to sign off on the decision.”
  4. “The comedy women and bridal attendants everywhere have been waiting for: “Bridesmaids” pulls no punches in portraying all of the regrettable situations a single woman can get herself into. Wiig’s script has her and the rest of the stellar cast (Maya Rudolph as the bride, Melissa McCarthy, Rose Byrne, Ellie Kemper and Wendi McLendon-Covey as fellow bridesmaids) vomiting and discussing other bodily functions in a way not usually seen in comedies starring women, and the result is brilliant and hilarious — the ultimate antidote to schlock like “27 Dresses.” As several critics pointed out, female comedians have been capable of making a movie like this all along – it’s only now that someone let them.”
  5. “After an Iowa town hall meeting in which Mitt Romney seemed not to understand a question about the Mississippi “personhood” amendment, which opponents feared could lead to a ban on oral contraceptives, Rachel Maddow spends a segment of her show explaining to Romney how the female reproductive system and birth control work — against a “man cave” background.”
  6. “Per the Affordable Care Act, all health insurance policies issued after January 1, 2013 must cover birth control — with no copays. The same provisions will cover breast pumps for nursing mothers, domestic violence counseling and a number of other women’s health services. What took them so long?”
  7. “In a Toys”R”Us store in Albany, N.Y., 4-year-old Riley Maida just can’t take it anymore and lets loose a frighteningly articulate rant about toy marketers targeting kids by gender. “Why do all the girls have to buy princesses? Some girls like superheroes, some girls like princesses,” she says, reasonably. “Some boys like superheroes, some boys like princesses. So why does all the girls have to buy pink stuff and all the boys have to buy different color stuff?”

NEWS ALERT- Saudi Women Granted Right to Vote

26 Sep

Over the weekend, King Abdullah granted women the right to vote in Saudi Arabia, a country where women are not allowed to drive or stand in the same line as men in public.  This is a huge step and a huge sign of the potential direction our world could go in terms of gender equality.

However, while we celebrate these women now being able to participate in the political process, we can’t forget that this is just one element of gender equality.  These women are still not allowed to drive (how will they get to the polls?), they are still oppressed through the inability to work various jobs, go to certain schools, or even sit in the same restaurant that men do.

While we take a moment to celebrate, we must also continue to spread the word of gender inequalities and continue to work towards a world where all humans are equal.

See Al Jazeera coverage below:

Politico: U.S. better off with Hillary Clinton?

16 Sep

U.S. better off with Hillary Clinton?

By MACKENZIE WEINGER | 9/16/11 6:29 AM EDT Updated: 9/16/11 4:22 PM EDT

It should have been you, Hillary.

In a case of serious buyer’s remorse, one-third of Americans say the United States would be better off if Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were president, according to a new poll Friday.

Clinton is the most popular national political figure in the country today, with 64 percent of Americans polled holding a favorable view of her, the Bloomberg poll shows.

And 34 percent say they think the U.S. would be in better shape if she had won the election over President Barack Obama.

In 2010, Bloomberg found just 25 percent saying they wished Clinton had become president.

Even tea party supporters are dreaming of Clinton — 44 percent told pollsters the U.S. would be better off with her as president, even as 59 percent say they hold an unfavorable view of her. And 39 percent of Republicans agree that Clinton would have run the country better than Obama.

Most Democrats, or 57 percent, say they think things would be the same.

Just 29 percent of those polled said they believe Sen. John McCain would have been the better pick, while 28 percent say they thought things would not be any different if he were president.

Just 13 percent told Bloomberg they thought things would be worse in the country if Clinton was in power, while 35 percent say the U.S. would be in bad shape with McCain as president. Almost half of all Americans — 47 percent — said they thought things would be about the same in a Clinton administration as Obama’s current one.

Bloomberg conducted its poll Sept. 9-12 and surveyed 997 adults. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.

Stop Using Birth Control as a Vehicle for Political Arguments

4 Aug

On my way to work this morning, I grabbed the two free tabloids (I like to try and keep an open mind by reading both.)  However, on the cover of the DC Examiner, a title immediately grabbed my attention: “Obama knows best: Birth control plan infringes on freedom of conscience.”  Say whaaaaaaaaaa?

So I flipped to the article, which basically claimed that Obama is catering to Planned Parenthood and drug industries by requiring insurance companies to offer birth control for free, and also claiming that the left is forcing their morality onto the entire population (aka, claiming that Joe Shmo who opposes birth control technically has to pay for it since it is tax-payer subsidized).

I’m pretty sure the last time I checked there were a number of things that are covered by health insurance that could possibly go against someone’s morality… ex. VIAGRA, but male politicians and reporters aren’t in uproar about that now are they? ;)  Also euthanasia, drug alcohol rehab, HIV/AIDS treatment…I’m pretty sure that’s how health insurance works, everybody chips in so you can get what you personally need at a cheaper rate…we don’t pick and choose.

Studies have shown that birth control is a HUGE benefit in regards to women’s reproductive health, and a huge cost benefit if you compare it to how many unwanted pregnancies would occur without it (especially in low economic status areas where federally-subsidized health care often kicks in at a higher rate.)

Thus, I wish people would stop jeopardizing women’s health issues, specifically the availability of free birth control, as a vehicle to further their own personal political arguments.  I especially despise when men do this in an inconsiderate manner.  Last time I checked, I’m pretty sure WE are the ones giving birth.  Please find another way to back up your arguments without compromising the health of 51% of the population.

Too Big To…Treat Women Fairly?

20 Jun

I’ve been reading Andrew Sorkin’s book Too Big to Fail and I’m loving the

inside look into these giant Wall Street firms.  They literally built themselves into these empires that are so huge, and our country is so invested in each of them, that we (the world) would be devastated if they failed and collapsed.   Remarkably scary.

Today, as I read multiple news articles on the Walmart v. Dukes ruling, this thought came to mind: “Is it becoming the corporate ideology to become too big to…insert phrase here…”

I could be completely wrong.   I’m not a judicial buff, but as I read the actual ruling and opinions, it really seems like the reason Wal-Mart won out, was because they were “too big” to actually have committed gender discrimination in the ‘same way’ among millions of female employees.

Scalia’s own opinion reads: “[there needed to be common elements tying together] literally millions of employment decisions at once and that is entirely absent here.”

How is that even possible?!  There is NO way that every instance of gender discrimination was conducted in the same way.  Manager A maybe likes to slap female employees on the butt, while Manager B likes to tell them they need to wear more makeup to work.  According to Scalia, it’s not a common element sooooo, sorry ladies!

Ok, so therefore if you are a company that is TOO big, you can get away with gender discrimination, because it will be practically impossible to find these “common elements” (What, one element? Two elements? How many are we talking here?) that tie together how you discriminate obviously. (sarcasm)

Well, social policy change in regards to gender isn’t going anywhere with the help of  SCOTUS, so what now?  Speaker Nancy Pelosi urged Congress today to pass the Paycheck Fairness Act.  Maybe that’s a vehicle for change?  For now, I think we can start ourselves (us ladies).  Refer to my past post on negotiating your salary with useful links on becoming empowered to ask for the paycheck you deserve.

Another political sex scandal…surprise surprise it’s a CongressMAN.

13 Jun

As the “Weinergate” scandal unfolded over the course of the last two weeks, I couldn’t help but think, how many of these politicians DON’T engage in inappropriate sexual conduct?

It seems that every other month, I open the paper to yet another MALE politician engaging in some kind of sex scandal.  (Ensign, Vitter, Massa, Spitzer, Edwards, Schwarzenegger…etc.) What is it with these men?!

So, I started asking people why they thought men politicians are always the ones involved in these sex scandals, and not female politicians?  I started with my boyfriend, then my colleagues (both male and female), and then some close friends.  All gave somewhat similar answers and mostly agreed that it had a lot to do with the power politicians have, and that ravenous hunger for more.

So I started thinking, do women just not care about power?  I like power.  I like leading people, having people count on me, being in charge, being in a position to make a difference, having people know who I am and like who I am, etc.  You can ask my mother if you think I’m kidding ;)  So is it really just the power trip?

One friend told me, “well women cheat too, they are just smarter and better at not getting caught.”  Maybe that’s a valid point, but the numbers just don’t seem to add up for that to be the one solid reason.  (For the record, tweeting a picture of your junk off of your official Twitter page is NOT SMART.)

Well, then I read this NYT piece over the weekend and I think it raises a VERY valid point, that may be an answer to the question:

Research points to a substantial gender gap in the way women and men approach running for office. Women have different reasons for running, are more reluctant to do so and, because there are so few of them in politics, are acutely aware of the scrutiny they draw — all of which seems to lead to differences in the way they handle their jobs once elected.

“The shorthand of it is that women run for office to do something, and men run for office to be somebody,” said Debbie Walsh, director of the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University. “Women run because there is some public issue that they care about, some change they want to make, some issue that is a priority for them, and men tend to run for office because they see this as a career path.”

“I have no hard evidence that women are less likely to engage in risky or somewhat stupid behavior,” Ms. Pearson said. “But women in Congress are still really in a situation where they have to prove themselves to their male colleagues and constituents. There’s sort of this extra level of seriousness.”

And voters demand it. Celinda Lake, a Democratic strategist, says female politicians are punished more harshly than men for misbehavior. “When voters find out men have ethics and honesty issues, they say, ‘Well, I expected that,’ “  Ms. Lake said. “When they find out it’s a woman, they say, ‘I thought she was better than that.’ “

The First Lady to Write Her Book!…on gardening?

24 Mar

I apologize for the week-long absence, but every woman needs from time-to-time a vacation from the “real world.”

Well, as I sat back down today to “reconnect” with the world, one tidbit that popped onto my radar was that the First Lady announced she’s going to write a book!

I became so giddy, and eager to see what she was going to write about!  She’s is and has been such an amazing leader for women and children through her “Let’s Move” campaign and  her endless support for women’s equality.  Plus, being a highly educated woman plus giving up her law career to become the First Lady of the US, to the very first black president the country has had, in my opinion is the perfect equation for an astounding book.  Oh, the things this book might have in it!

But wait…I read further.  It’s going to be a book about gardening.  Whaaaaaaaaaaaa?  I know the First Lady has done amazing things with the White House garden and the first White House farmers market, but that’s going to be the whole book?  As mentioned above, she’s helped move mountains in so many other areas!  In no way am I dissing gardening, I love gardens and am very proud and supportive of all the people out their that put endless amounts of labor into gardens, the very gardens that help feed all of our stomachs.

I can only hope that our lovely First Lady writes a second book after her gardening one.  I will continue to wait patiently.

Sotomayor Speaks Out About Sexist Questioning

10 Mar

In a National Journal article this week, Justice Sotomayor spoke out about the sexist questioning she received during her confirmation hearings for the US Supreme Court:

After pre-approved questions from two Northwestern University School of Law professors, she was most revealing during questioning from law students, especially when one woman suggested that the questioning Sotomayor and the most recent other appointee, Elena Kagan, faced was laden with male-driven assumptions.

“You know, and I don’t mean to be graphic, but one day after I’d been questioned endlessly, for weeks at a time, I was so frustrated by the minutiae of what I was being asked about and said to a friend, ‘I think they already know the color of my underwear,’” the justice said.

“There were private questions I was offended by. I was convinced they were not asking those questions of the male applicants,” Sotomayor said, alluding to questions about her dating habits.

“I wondered if they ever asked those questions of the male candidates. But the society has a double standard.”

Sotomayor,who is single, then cited her “many single male colleagues who are judges who date often, bring dates to court affairs and nobody ever talks about them. I knew if I did the same thing, my morals would be questioned.”

Just as Sotomayor states, the double standard is everywhere and especially in the working world.  It seems men get applauded when they show up to a function with a tall bombshell one night, and a different one the next.  High fives all around! But if women does that, I’m almost positive her colleagues would look down upon her.

I’ll ask again, where did this double standard originate, and what can be done to diminish it?  Is it in our genes?  Is it from what we watch on tv? Or read in comic strips that fuels the fire?

Women ARE Changing the Face of Politics

4 Feb

As I read this fabulous article on Politico this morning , I smiled SO big reading over the quote ““Women bring something different to the table. Their ability to relate to each other could really set a tone for the rest of Congress.”

I smiled at first because I spent the majority of my senior year of college writing my senior honors thesis on the under representation of women in state legislatures, and why having so few women representing us is a profound problem.  Through the hands-on research I was able to conduct, it was clear that women bring something very, very different to the table when it comes to how they view policy issues.  But I won’t bore you with the nitty gritty of my research.

What really REALLY made me smile even MORE about this article, was the fact that it shows how well women can work together to get things DONE.  I truly believe working civilly together is something that women do…yes I’m going to say it…better than men.  (Sorry all my male friends out there.)

Women too have our fair share of “Type-A” personalities, but strong disagreements can be set aside when working towards a common goal:  A better country to live in.  These fabulous 17 senators are proving just that.  I really do believe that these women are beginning to change the face of politics, and show us how we all can work together during tougher times to get to that greener side.  Maybe I’m too much of an idealist?  However, when I read things like this article, I begin to believe that maybe my dreams and ideals aren’t that far from reality…

As a side note, I thought it was fun that several of the women went together to watch the comedy show “A Girl’s Guide to Politics.”  I just wish I would have been at the same  showing they went to!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: